मेरे समलैंगिक मित्र और मैं (iv)
53,474 97%
mere samlaingik mitr aur main (iv)
Sex with a lesbian friend again, although she wants to get pregnant this time we didn't ... She's so kinky.
3 वर्षो पूर्व
03:00
डीप थ्रोट मुख-मैथुन
216.3K views
03:54
गर्म मुख-मैथुन फार्म मेरे प्रेमिका
154.3K views
02:09
एमेच्योर मुख-मैथुन, मुँह में सह
93.9K views
01:24
सुंदर मुख-मैथुन
265.2K views
01:22
भयानक मुख-मैथुन डब्ल्यू फेशियल
107.2K views
04:46
Girlfriend Gets Deepthroat Cum in Mouth, CIM
64.8K views
10:48
घर का बना प्रेमिका चूसने मुर्गा
423.2K views
टिप्पणियाँ
101
टिप्पणियाँ पोस्ट करने के लिए कृपया लॉग इन करें या पंजीकरण करें
प्रति hypermatum : I am agreeing to hypermatum's views. you simply are not a lesbian anymore the minute you are with a guy. good video but misleading title. and it's not the title that is entirely off but it is the publisher's idea that lesbians have sex with guys and are still lesbians that is the real problem. it should read ex-lesbian or bisexual friend.
जवाब दें मूल टिप्पणी दिखाएं
Hi again. First let me say that my intent here isn't to stir up debate or hard feelings.
You can play on words all that you like, but at the end of the day, a "lesbian" is a homosexual female who is NOT attracted to men and has NO sexual relations with men whatsoever. Period. This is a FACT; not just someone's opinion. Language is law and it applies to everyone universally as a specific meaning to any given word. This cannot be debated, since fact is fact.
Defined by dictionary terms (laws of language):
L̲e̲s̲b̲i̲a̲n̲: 1 .) denoting or relating to women who are sexually or romantically attracted 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗬 to other women, or to sexual attraction or activity between women.
2 .) a woman who is sexually or romantically attracted 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗬 to other women; a gay woman.
Therefore, these series of published, universal definitions prove my very point. Is this definition "inapplicable law"?? Of course not! If a "lesbian" is a gay/homosexual female who is EXCLUSIVELY romantically/sexually attracted to other women, then your "lesbian" friend isn't at all "lesbian" if the video shows her sexually engaged with you, as a man. This is basic, simple stuff to understand. She's "bi-sexual". We might conclude that, at very least, she's "bi-curious" in a sense to experiment sexually with a man to determine if she wants to remain homosexual (a.k.a. "lesbian") O̲R̲ go both ways (a.k.a. "bi-sexual") from that point forward in her life.
Again, you can falsely play on words all day long, but in the end, it makes no sense when matched up to the universal definition of the term you're choosing to use. Worse yet, I feel that misusing the word and truly believing in your mind that it serves as various meanings, proves that you are the risky one, not me.
Right, we all have the sexuality that we all choose. That's not the point. It's the wording and phrases being used is what's the problem here.
And for the record, I don't need to know you or your friend at all to make the logical determination that a "lesbian" who is engaged sexually with a man, makes zero sense. You're trying to prove an invalid point that just because I don't personally now someone, I therefore cannot make a conclusion and determination, based upon the evidence at play here via the video itself, the video title or upon your claims. Incorrect. Bottom line: Lesbians don't have sex of any kind with men. Period. That's not even a debate or opinion, but rather, a fact. Again, simply compare your claims and evidence against to the actual definition of the word to see how silly it is...especially to those in the lifestyle and who understand the word.
I appreciate your video and kind comments, nonetheless.
You can play on words all that you like, but at the end of the day, a "lesbian" is a homosexual female who is NOT attracted to men and has NO sexual relations with men whatsoever. Period. This is a FACT; not just someone's opinion. Language is law and it applies to everyone universally as a specific meaning to any given word. This cannot be debated, since fact is fact.
Defined by dictionary terms (laws of language):
L̲e̲s̲b̲i̲a̲n̲: 1 .) denoting or relating to women who are sexually or romantically attracted 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗬 to other women, or to sexual attraction or activity between women.
2 .) a woman who is sexually or romantically attracted 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗬 to other women; a gay woman.
Therefore, these series of published, universal definitions prove my very point. Is this definition "inapplicable law"?? Of course not! If a "lesbian" is a gay/homosexual female who is EXCLUSIVELY romantically/sexually attracted to other women, then your "lesbian" friend isn't at all "lesbian" if the video shows her sexually engaged with you, as a man. This is basic, simple stuff to understand. She's "bi-sexual". We might conclude that, at very least, she's "bi-curious" in a sense to experiment sexually with a man to determine if she wants to remain homosexual (a.k.a. "lesbian") O̲R̲ go both ways (a.k.a. "bi-sexual") from that point forward in her life.
Again, you can falsely play on words all day long, but in the end, it makes no sense when matched up to the universal definition of the term you're choosing to use. Worse yet, I feel that misusing the word and truly believing in your mind that it serves as various meanings, proves that you are the risky one, not me.
Right, we all have the sexuality that we all choose. That's not the point. It's the wording and phrases being used is what's the problem here.
And for the record, I don't need to know you or your friend at all to make the logical determination that a "lesbian" who is engaged sexually with a man, makes zero sense. You're trying to prove an invalid point that just because I don't personally now someone, I therefore cannot make a conclusion and determination, based upon the evidence at play here via the video itself, the video title or upon your claims. Incorrect. Bottom line: Lesbians don't have sex of any kind with men. Period. That's not even a debate or opinion, but rather, a fact. Again, simply compare your claims and evidence against to the actual definition of the word to see how silly it is...especially to those in the lifestyle and who understand the word.
I appreciate your video and kind comments, nonetheless.
जवाब दें
You're welcome. I appreciate your kind follow-up, as well. And although I appreciate your attempt to explain the "lesbian" thing, regarding your friend, I respectfully just cannot agree upon it, as it makes no logical sense. A lesbian is a homosexual female...key word "homosexual" (homo = one/same; a.k.a. "gay"). If a lesbian is with someone of the opposite sex, then that automatically renders her as "bi-sexual" (bi = two); not "lesbian" (same sex). It's like someone cannot be half pregnant. You're either pregnant or you aren't.
I've had conversations for years over many various topics, sexual and non-sexual. Some so-called "straight" men out there swear that they aren't bi-sexual IF they ONLY have oral sex experiences with other men. Again, one man's penis in another man's mouth renders each man either gay or bi-sexual, and there's no "straight" about it. Period. In other circumstances, so-called "vegans" claim that there are certain levels of "veganism" and that by eating certain shellfish and such other similar foods, that they are still in fact "vegans". Again, back to the half-pregnant thing. You're either a vegan 100% or you're not...and if you somehow fall into the "you're not" category, then you are something else other than a vegan, which is likely rendered as an omnivore, keto, etc... .
But without getting carried away here, your video of your bi-sexual friend and yourself was enjoyable. Thank you for posting it. Much enjoyed.
I've had conversations for years over many various topics, sexual and non-sexual. Some so-called "straight" men out there swear that they aren't bi-sexual IF they ONLY have oral sex experiences with other men. Again, one man's penis in another man's mouth renders each man either gay or bi-sexual, and there's no "straight" about it. Period. In other circumstances, so-called "vegans" claim that there are certain levels of "veganism" and that by eating certain shellfish and such other similar foods, that they are still in fact "vegans". Again, back to the half-pregnant thing. You're either a vegan 100% or you're not...and if you somehow fall into the "you're not" category, then you are something else other than a vegan, which is likely rendered as an omnivore, keto, etc... .
But without getting carried away here, your video of your bi-sexual friend and yourself was enjoyable. Thank you for posting it. Much enjoyed.
जवाब दें
Nice content, but with a heading hiccup. "My lesbian friend and me"?? Apparently the "lesbian" part was past tense, as any so-called "lesbian" who is sexually engaged with a guy would now be rendered as "bi-sexual". Nevertheless, great video content. It was quite enjoyable to watch.
जवाब दें